SELF-LEARNING AND ADAPTIVE ML PIPELINES: END-TO-END AUTOMATION FROM FEATURE ENGINEERING TO MODEL COMPARISON

Authors

  • Anuja Nagpal University of South Florida, USA. Author

Keywords:

Adaptive ML Pipelines, AutoM, Self-learning AI Systems, Automated Feature Engineering, AI Democratizatio

Abstract

This article explores the emerging field of self-learning and adaptive ML pipelines, which offer end-to-end automation from feature engineering to model comparison in machine learning workflows. We examine the fundamental concepts, key components, and functional mechanisms of these advanced pipelines, highlighting their ability to dynamically adjust to incoming data and automate essential tasks such as data preprocessing, feature selection, and hyperparameter tuning. Through case studies in finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, we demonstrate the real-world applications and benefits of adaptive ML pipelines, including significant improvements in efficiency, accuracy, and scalability. The impact of this technology on ML development and deployment is analyzed, focusing on the reduction in time and resource requirements, scalability benefits for businesses, and the democratization of AI capabilities. Looking ahead, we discuss the potential for autonomous, self-improving AI systems, the promise of continuous performance enhancement with minimal human intervention, and the challenges and limitations that need to be overcome. This comprehensive article underscores the transformative potential of adaptive ML pipelines in shaping the future of AI and machine learning across various industries.

References

Y. Wang et al., "AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art," Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 212, p. 106622, Jan. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106622

F. Hutter, L. Kotthoff, and J. Vanschoren, "Automated Machine Learning: Methods, Systems, Challenges," Springer, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05318-5

J. Gama, I. Žliobaitė, A. Bifet, M. Pechenizkiy, and A. Bouchachia, "A survey on concept drift adaptation," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1-37, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2523813

I. Guyon and A. Elisseeff, "An introduction to variable and feature selection," Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 3, pp. 1157-1182, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume3/guyon03a/guyon03a.pdf

M. A. Zoller and M. F. Huber, "Benchmark and Survey of Automated Machine Learning Frameworks," Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 70, pp. 409-472, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11854

D. Sculley et al., "Hidden Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 28, pp. 2503-2511, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2015/file/86df7dcfd896fcaf2674f757a2463eba-Paper.pdf

I. Rahwan et al., "Machine behaviour," Nature, vol. 568, no. 7753, pp. 477-486, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1138-y

Downloads

Published

2024-08-29