DIFFERENTIAL PRIVACY IN DIGITAL ADVERTISING: BALANCING AUDIENCE INSIGHTS AND USER PRIVACY

Authors

  • Swati Sinha MICA, Ahmedabad, India Author

Keywords:

Differential Privacy, Audience Analytics, Privacy-Preserving Advertising, Data Utility Trade-offs, Digital Marketing Ethics

Abstract

This article explores the application of differential privacy in audience analytics for digital advertising, addressing the critical challenge of balancing effective targeting with user privacy protection. We investigate various differential privacy mechanisms, including the Laplace, Exponential, and Gaussian mechanisms, and their applicability to audience insights. Through comprehensive experimentation and analysis, we demonstrate the trade-offs between privacy guarantees and insight granularity, showing how advertisers can maintain valuable audience understanding while adhering to strict privacy standards. Our findings reveal that differentially private approaches, while introducing some noise and reducing data granularity, can preserve overall advertising effectiveness while significantly enhancing user privacy and trust. We discuss implementation strategies for advertisers, including the integration of differential privacy into existing analytics pipelines and techniques for querying and interpreting privacy-preserved datasets. The article also examines the broader implications for the digital advertising ecosystem, considering regulatory compliance, ethical considerations, and the potential for industry-wide adoption. Our research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on privacy-preserving technologies in advertising and provides practical insights for stakeholders navigating the complex landscape of user privacy and data-driven marketing. By demonstrating the viability of differential privacy in audience analytics, this work paves the way for a more privacy-conscious approach to digital advertising that aligns with evolving regulatory requirements and user expectations.

References

C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, and A. Smith, "Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis," in Theory of Cryptography Conference, New York, NY, USA, 2006, pp. 265-284. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/11681878_14

A. Machanavajjhala, D. Kifer, J. Abowd, J. Gehrke, and L. Vilhuber, "Privacy: Theory meets Practice on the Map," in 2008 IEEE 24th International Conference on Data Engineering, Cancun, Mexico, 2008, pp. 277-286. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4497436

F. D. McSherry, "Privacy integrated queries: an extensible platform for privacy-preserving data analysis," in Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data, Providence, RI, USA, 2009, pp. 19-30. [Online]. Available:

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1559845.1559850

C. Dwork and A. Roth, "The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy," Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 9, no. 3-4, pp. 211-407, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.nowpublishers.com/article/Details/TCS-042

Ú. Erlingsson, V. Pihur, and A. Korolova, "RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response," in Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA, 2014, pp. 1054-1067. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2660267.2660348

R. Chen, H. Li, A. K. Qin, S. P. Kasiviswanathan, and H. Jin, "Private spatial data aggregation in the local setting," in 2016 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Helsinki, Finland, 2016, pp. 289-300. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7498248

B. Ding, J. Kulkarni, and S. Yekhanin, "Collecting Telemetry Data Privately," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA, 2017, pp. 3571-3580. [Online]. Available: https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2017/hash/253614bbac999b38b5b60cae531c4969-Abstract.html

A. Chaudhuri, S. Sarwate, and K. Sinha, "A Near-Optimal Algorithm for Differentially-Private Principal Components," Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 2905-2943, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://jmlr.org/papers/v14/chaudhuri13a.html

R. Cummings, S. Krehbiel, Y. Mei, R. Tuo, and W. Zhang, "Differentially Private Change-Point Detection," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (NeurIPS 2018), Montréal, Canada, 2018, pp. 10825-10834. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2018/file/f19ec2b84181033bf4753a5a51d5d608-Paper.pdf

J. Tang, A. Korolova, X. Bai, X. Wang, and X. Wang, "Privacy Loss in Apple's Implementation of Differential Privacy on MacOS 10.12," arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.02753, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.02753

Downloads

Published

2024-11-11

How to Cite

Swati Sinha. (2024). DIFFERENTIAL PRIVACY IN DIGITAL ADVERTISING: BALANCING AUDIENCE INSIGHTS AND USER PRIVACY. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (IJCET), 15(6), 252-261. https://mylib.in/index.php/IJCET/article/view/IJCET_15_06_021