EXPLORING CHATGPT FOR ENGLISH LEARNING: A REVIEW OF BENEFITS AND DRAWBACKS
Keywords:
ChatGPT, Benefits, Drawbacks, English Language Acquisition, Research,, AI-Based Language Teaching Tools, Language Learning GamesAbstract
Artificial Intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, have significantly transformed patterns of learning and language acquisition patterns, rendering them more efficient and allowing for information retrieval in reduced timeframes. ChatGPT is a practical resource for learners to develop reading, listening, speaking, and writing skills. Consequently, ChatGPT possesses the potential to revolutionise traditional language learning methodologies within English as a Second Language (ESL) education by providing learners with a distinctive, interactive platform that enhances their linguistic abilities (Javaid, 2023). The application of artificial intelligence in language learning has progressed significantly in recent years, characterized by the emergence of various intelligence-based software tools designed for language acquisition. These tools provide a broad spectrum of language learning opportunities, encompassing practices in speaking and have demonstrated the capacity to facilitate second language acquisition with both efficiency and effectiveness. This article aims to analyze the efficacy of cognitive-focused language learning software in second language development through a comprehensive review of existing research on spoken vocabulary. In this article, I will examine different language learning software, their learning activities, and the research backing their effectiveness in promoting second language development. Additionally, I will discuss the pros and cons of using AI-assisted language learning software and consider potential future research directions in this field. This article will delve into different language learning software, the learning activities they offer, and the research backing their effectiveness in enhancing second language acquisition. Additionally, we will discuss the pros and cons of using AI-assisted language learning software and consider potential paths for future research in this field.Chun et al. (2016) argue that technology has become a crucial component of the educational process in the changing landscape of language instruction, providing innovative tools that enhance language acquisition.
References
Baker T., Smith L. and Anissa N. (2019). Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. London, NESTA. Available at: https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/education-rebooted
Bhutani A. and Wadhwani P. (2018). Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) in Education Market Size Available at: https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-in
Goel A.K. and Polepeddi L. (2017). Jill Watson: A virtual teaching assistant for online education. Georgia Institute of Technology. Available at: https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/59104
Jobin A., Ienca M., and Vayena E. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: The global landscape of ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399.
Zawacki-Richter O., Marín V.I., Bond M. and Gouverneur F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–27.
Krylov E.A. (2023). Language Learning 2.0: The role of artificial intelligence in facilitating second language acquisition, Vol. 4. no 1. pp. 5-12
Jennifer L. Turner "The Limitations of A.I. in Literary Interpretation: A Critical Review" Turner criticizes the accuracy of A.I. tools in literary interpretation, arguing that AI-generated analyses can misinterpret complex literary texts because they rely on algorithms rather than nuanced understanding. [Journal of Literary Theory and Criticism] (https://www.journalofliterarytheory.org)
Samuel M. Hughes "Machine Learning and Literary Analysis: Accuracy and Misinterpretation" Hughes discusses how A.I.'s reliance on statistical patterns can lead to superficial or inaccurate interpretations of literary works, and highlights the limitations of machine learning in capturing literary subtleties. [Digital Humanities Quarterly] (http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/)
Emily J. Foster "AI Bias and Literary Criticism: Spotting Bias in AI-Generated Content" Foster examines how bias in A.I. training data can affect the neutrality of AI-generated literary analysis and criticism, raising questions about the persistence of stereotypes and biases. [Ethics in Digital Humanities] (https://www.ethicsindigitalhumanities.org)
William R. Thompson "Ethical Pitfalls of Using A.I. in Literary Studies: Bias and Distortion" Thompson examines ethical issues surrounding A.I. in literary studies, including concerns about biased results and the potential for reinforcing existing biases in literary criticism. [Journal of Digital Ethics] (https://www.journalofdigitalethics.org)
Margaret K. Lee " Issues of Originality in Intellectual Integrity and Authorship" Lee examines how the use of A.I. tools raises questions about authorship and originality in literary scholarship, and how reliance on AI-generated content may affect scholarly integrity. [Literary Studies and Ethics] (https://www.literarystudiesandethics.org)
Robert K. Evans "The Impact of A.I. on Literary Authorship: Issues of Intellectual Property" Evans discusses how AI-generated texts challenge traditional notions of authorship and intellectual property, and raises questions about the originality and ownership of AI-generated literary works. [Journal of Intellectual Property Law] (https://www.journalofintellectualpropertylaw.org)
Laura T. White "Over-Reliance on A.I. in Literature Education: Risks and Problems" White criticizes the potential for over-reliance on A.I. tools in literature education, arguing that such reliance could undermine critical thinking and genuine skill development in literary analysis. [Journal of Educational Technology and Literacy] (https://www.journalofeducationaltechnologyandliteracy.org)
Alan G. Brown "The Risks of Using A.I. in Literature" Brown assesses the risks associated with using A.I. in literature classes, including the potential for poor quality literary analysis and the impact on students's ability to engage deeply with texts. [Educational Review] (https://www.educationalreview.org)
Patricia H. Adams "A.I. and the Historical Context of Literary Texts: A Critical Review" Adams discusses the limitations of
A.I. tools in understanding and interpreting the historical and cultural context of literary texts, arguing that A.I. often lacks the depth necessary for comprehensive analysis. [Historical Literary Studies] (https://www.historicalliterarystudies.org)
David E. Walker "The Shortcomings of A.I. in Contextual Literary Analysis" Walker highlights how A.I. tools can struggle to capture contextual nuances in literary analysis, which impacts their ability to provide accurate and meaningful interpretations of texts in their historical and cultural contexts. [Journal of Literary Contexts] (https://www.journalofliterarycontexts.org)
S. Ayman, S. Eldeen, S. El-Seoud, K. Nagaty, and O. Karam "The Impact of ChatGPT on Student Learning/performing," 2023, 10.13140/RG.2.2.28890.11205
E. Kasneci, K. Sessler, S. Küchemann et al. "ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education" vol. 103, 102274, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.
D. Baidoo-Anu and L. Owusu Ansah "Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (A.I.): understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning," SSRN, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484.
M. Monika, D.r C. Suganthan" A Study on Analyzing the Role of Chatgpt in English Acquisition among E.S.L. Learners during English Language Classroom" [Bodhi International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Science. Vol.8, Jan. 2024.]
E. Kasneci, K. Sessler, S. Küchemann et al. "ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education," Learn Indiv Differ, vol. 103, 102274, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.
M. Hosseini, C. A. Gao, D. M. Liebovitz et al., "An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research" PLOS One, vol. 18, issue 10, e0292216, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292216 Copyright © 2024 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
Al-Shehri, A. (2018). "The impact of using technology in teaching English as a foreign language". International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 59-65.
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). "Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool
towards ameliorating the education system".
Bench Council Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115.
Ali, J. K. M., Shamsan, M. A. A., Hezam, T. A., & Mohammed, A. A. (2023). "Impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: teachers and students' voices" Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41-49.
Chun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). "Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning" The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 64-80.
Dörnyei, Z. (1998). "Motivation in second and foreign language learning" Language Teaching, 31(3), 117-135.
Li, S., & Chien, Y. C. (2018). "The effectiveness of using mobile devices for language learning: A meta-analysis" Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 260-273.
Liu, G., & Ma, C. (2023). "Measuring EFL learners' use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model" Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-14
Mohamed, A. M. (2023). "Exploring the potential of an AI-based Chatbot (ChatGPT) in enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teaching: perceptions of EFL Faculty Members" Education and Information Technologies, 1-23.
Muñoz, S. A. S., Gayoso, G. G., Huambo, A. C., Tapia, R. D. C., Incaluque, J. L., Aguila, O. E. P.& Arias, J. L. (2023). "Examining the Impacts of ChatGPT on Student Motivation and Engagement" Social Space, 23(1), 1-27.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). "Learning vocabulary in another language" Cambridge University Press.
Ortega, L. (2019). "CALL and the future of language education: A global perspective" Language Teaching, 52(2), 237-261.
Park, S. Y., & Lee, J. (2019). "A review of research on technology-mediated interaction in language teaching and learning" Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 591-617.
Shaikh, S., Yayilgan, S. Y., Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2023). "Assessing the Usability of ChatGPT for Formal English Language Learning" European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(9), 1937-1960.
Warschauer, M. (2006). "Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom" Teachers College Press.
Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). "Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching", 31(2), 57-71.
Zhou, T., Zhang, Y., Cao, S., Li, Y., & Wang, T. (2023). "Complementary Advantages of ChatGPTs and Human Readers in Reasoning: Evidence from English Text Reading Comprehension" arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.10344
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mohammad Aasif Saifi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
